US SPOOKS EXPOSED MASSIVELY SPYING ON THEIR OWN PEOPLE        by Murray Horton

Peace Researcher 33 –  November 2006

 

 

The US National Security Agency (NSA) is the world’s biggest Intelligence agency, much bigger than the better known Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). It is the Big Daddy of all the Big Brothers. Its role is signals intelligence (SIGINT) and electronic intelligence (ELINT). It is the spider at the centre of the web that is the super-secret UKUSA Agreement, by which it and the junior agencies in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (the NZ Government Communications Security Bureau – GCSB) divide up the world for collecting SIGINT and ELINT. The most notorious of the various projects for doing this kind of spying is the one codenamed Echelon, by which billions of key words are data mined and analysed by banks of computers, using the Dictionary programme, at the NSA’s HQ at Fort Meade, Maryland (which boasts the world’s biggest and fastest super-computer). To collect this mindboggling amount of data requires a global network of spybases – that is where little old New Zealand comes into the picture, with the secret Waihopai spybase which intercepts regional civilian communications transmitted by satellite. Basically Waihopai and its sister bases around the world simply download the stolen communications and forward them on to the NSA unprocessed (Echelon is far from the only such spying programme. For example, there is another one codenamed Tempest).

 

NSA’s Domestic Spying Had Gone On For Years

 

Unlike the CIA, which specialises in human intelligence (HUMINT) the NSA likes to stay in the shadows. But, in December 2005, it found itself thrust into the spotlight by the revelation that, since 2002, it had been clandestinely and illegally spying on Americans in the US. Because of the massive and systematic abuses of power by the NSA, CIA and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which came to light during the 1968-74 Presidency of Richard Nixon, such no-warrant domestic spying has been expressly prohibited by law since 1978. The New York Times expose (16/12/05) revealed that President Bush issued a secret Executive Order in 2002 to allow the NSA to “eavesdrop without a warrant on phone conversations, e-mail and other electronic communications, even when at least one party to the exchange was in the US – the circumstance that would ordinarily trigger the warrant requirement” (Time, 9/1/06; “The Spying Controversy: Has Bush Gone Too Far?”; Richard Lacayo). It turns out that the New York Times had sat on the story for a year and only published it on the day of a key Congressional vote on Bush’s controversial PATRIOT Act, a cornerstone of the legislative dictatorship that the US has been rapidly turning into in the paranoid hysteria following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington DC. The vote was lost and Bush and his cronies in government and the media bitterly assailed those who had exposed the secret NSA spying – Bush had unsuccessfully summonsed both the editor and publisher of the Times to the White House to urge them not to print the story. He and his mates came out swinging, saying that the US is at war and that the ends (national security) justifies the means.

 

The 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) created the secret, 11 member FISA court whose job it is to hear NSA requests for warrants. It is basically a rubber stamp for the spies. “According to the Justice Department, from 1979 to 2004 the court approved 18,724 wiretaps and denied only three, all in 2003” (Time, ibid). And, in cases which the NSA deems urgent, it is allowed to spy without a warrant as long as it applies for one within 72 hours (these warrants are only needed for spying on Americans; none are required for spying on foreigners). FBI domestic phone tapping is expedited under the PATRIOT Act, allowing the Bureau to issue National Security Letters to secure customer information from banks and phone, Internet and credit card companies. In 2005, 9,254 such Letters were issued, seeking information on 3,501 people.

 

But Bush and the NSA decided that even the figleaf of the totally compliant FISA court is an unnecessary hindrance to the smooth functioning of the police State. It is, of course, all part of the same post-September 11 pattern that has seen “enemy combatants” held indefinitely and incommunicado, without legal redress, at the US military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; the systematic use of torture there and in US prisons in Iraq; kidnapping of alleged “terrorists” (many of whom turn out to be innocent) and their “rendition” by the CIA to third party countries for torture or even murder, quite often in a newly created network of secret CIA prisons in countries ranging from Afghanistan to Eastern Europe (the latter having gone from Soviet puppets in the old Cold War days to American arselickers in the Brave New World of One Superpower). And it is part of the pattern that is glorified in US propaganda such as Fox TV’s series “24” (screened on primetime on TV3) which glorifies US secret agents who use any methods, routinely including torture, to save the US from demonic, foreign terrorists.

 

Phonetapping To Create The World’s Biggest Database

 

The revelation that the NSA was spying on Americans was taken to a whole other plane in May 2006, when it was revealed that the Agency was quietly compiling the world’s largest database by securing the phone records of the 200 million Americans who are customers of AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth, which combined carry roughly 80% of the nation’s landline calls and half of the wireless ones. Qwest, a Colorado-based company with about 14 million customers, refused to turn over its records to the Government because there was no court order requiring it to do so. It resisted heavy pressure from the NSA, including the threat that Qwest might not get future classified work with the Government.

 

Commentators described this as an attempt “to create a database of every call ever made” within the nation’s borders (USA Today, 11/5/06). Indeed there are suggestions that the spying may have gone beyond just phone calls. Also in May, a lawsuit filed against AT&T by privacy advocates contained allegations by a former AT&T technician that the giant telecommunications company allowed the NSA to install equipment capable of examining every individual message on the Internet.

 

Bush himself was unrepentant, merely declaring that: “’We’re not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans. Our efforts are focused on links to al Qaeda terrorists and its affiliates. The intelligence activities I authorised were lawful’, without specifying which laws in particular had authorised them” (Time, 22/5/06; “Inside Bush’s Secret Spy Net”, Karen Tumulty). In the past, he’d felt the need to reassure the American people by the time honoured method of lying. “…On April 20, 2004, he told a crowd in Buffalo, New York, that warrants were still required for all wiretaps. ‘By the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretaps – a wiretap requires a court order,’ Bush said. ‘Nothing has changed, by the way. When we’re talking about chasing down terrorists, we’re talking about getting a court order before we do so…’” (consortiumnews.com, 12/5/06; “This Time, It Really Is Orwellian”, Robert Parry).

 

Not only was Bush defiant about this vast spying programme directed against his own people, the Government actively obstructed official investigations into it (shades of President Nixon and the 1970s’ Watergate scandal which brought about his downfall). In May, the Justice Department’s Ethics Office was forced to end its investigation into the conduct of its own lawyers who gave legal advice on the previously disclosed NSA domestic spying programme (officially titled the Terrorist Surveillance Program), because the investigating lawyers were denied the necessary security clearances to look into the matter.

 

Waihopai Makes New Zealand An Accomplice

 

And this is not something from which New Zealanders can remain aloof, shrugging our shoulders and saying “only in America”. Green MP, Keith Locke, the Party’s Security and Intelligence Spokesperson, correctly pointed out that: “Waihopai makes New Zealand complicit in the actions of what looks more and more like an outlaw agency. The two satellite dishes at the Waihopai station near Blenheim pull down all the phones, faxes and e-mails passing through the two communications satellites over the Equator.

 

"Many details of these messages are then forwarded to the NSA, after they have been filtered for key words and sender and recipient details. The NSA then, clearly, links them to its domestic surveillance data banks. … the White House authorised the NSA to eavesdrop without warrants on international calls and e-mail traffic of US citizens. Now, we find that the NSA collects and maintains these huge data banks of domestic phone calls, e-mails and faxes.

 

"The information that we forward from Waihopai turns all of us into accomplices in this programme of dubious legality. Earlier this week, the US Department of Justice was forced to suspend its investigation of the NSA domestic spy programme. All too often, critics of White House policies get accused of being anti-American. But, as in this case, we are really speaking out to defend the American people from the actions of their own government" (press release, 12/5/06; “Waihopai spies are the real anti-Americans”).

 

Judge Rules NSA Domestic Spying Illegal & Unconstitutional

 

Fortunately, at least one branch of the American State still has some scruples, namely the courts (which have dealt Bush heavy blows in other areas of his “War On Terror”, such as denying him the right to detain indefinitely without trial – and to torture – “terrorists” at the notorious Guatanamo Bay hellhole). The American Council for Civil Liberties took the NSA to court and, in August 2006, Federal Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled the Agency’s Terrorist Surveillance Program illegal and issued a permanent injunction against it. “In this case, the President has acted, undisputedly, as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act forbids” (CommonDreams.org, 28/8/06; “JonBenet Died – And Bush Lied?”, Thom Hartmann). Judge Taylor went further than declaring the spying Program illegal, she also declared it unconstitutional. “There are no hereditary kings in America and no powers not created by the Constitution. It was never the intention of the (constitutional) framers to give the President such unfettered control, particularly when his actions blatantly disregard the parameters clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights” (Philippine Daily Inquirer, 19/8/06, “US Federal judge halts wiretapping”). The ruling was immediately appealed by the NSA and the injunction was temporarily stayed ahead of an appeals court ruling.

 

The Bush Administration was not going to let inconvenient matters like courts and the Constitution get in the way of its warrantless domestic spying programme. In September, the House of Representatives passed a Bill providing Congressional authorisation for such spying when the President deems it necessary. The Bill would authorise the President to order surveillance for up to 90 days after a “terrorist attack” – if there is a reasonable belief that the target is communicating with a terrorist group. In the case of an “imminent threat of attack” the President would also be permitted to authorise up to 90 days warrantless electronic surveillance and could submit unlimited subsequent certifications to Congressional Intelligence committees and a judge to extend the surveillance. In short, this Bill authorises unlimited domestic spying without need of a warrant. It was passed on party lines but Bush was unable to achieve his goal of getting it through the Senate, and thus signed into law, before Congress adjourned for the November 2006 midterm elections. Any such law is also likely to be challenged in court.

 

The Coup Of The Geeks: NSA Director Takes Over CIA

 

At the same time the massive NSA phonetapping operation was exposed, in May 2006, President Bush nominated Air Force General Michael Hayden to be the new Director of the CIA. This was particularly provocative because Hayden was an NSA veteran of 30 years experience and a previous Director of it. The first NSA domestic spying operation to be exposed (in December 2005) was authorised by him. This led to opposition from influential quarters to Hayden taking over the CIA. For example, the Los Angeles Times (quoted in the Press, 13/5/06) wrote an editorial entitled “The wrong spy”: “…It is easy to nitpick Hayden’s nomination. If the Agency needs to refocus on human intelligence, would it not make more sense to bring in a Director with experience in that area? Hayden comes from the gadget-oriented NSA. And the fact that he is a military man taking over the one formidable non-military Intelligence agency at a time when Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld’s Pentagon is expanding its intelligence capabilities is raising legitimate concerns.

 

“But the most disturbing part of Hayden’s resume, and the one that disqualifies him for the job, is his proud parenthood of the NSA’s eavesdropping programme. Under the programme, the Agency listens in on conversations between US residents and overseas parties without seeking  a warrant from secret courts set up for this purpose. Hayden has spoken in defence of the programme’s constitutionality, and the White House thinks it has the upper hand politically on this issue. In the name of fighting terror, most Americans seem willing to allow Bush to chisel away at their privacy and the Bill of Rights. Senators may find it hard to derail Hayden’s nomination. But they should use his confirmation hearings to ascertain exactly what those NSA eavesdroppers are up to”.

 

Be that as it may, Hayden was duly confirmed as the latest CIA Director, thus completing the primacy of ELINT/SIGINT over HUMINT, exactly parallel to what happened in NZ’s spy world in 2006, when GCSB Director Warren Tucker became the new Director-General of the Security Intelligence Service. The parallel goes even further. Hayden is an Air Force General. The new GCSB Director is Air Marshal Bruce Ferguson, former Chief of Defence Force. So, in both countries (the biggest and smallest members of the UKUSA Agreement) the military and the geeks are in the ascendancy over the classic spooks.

 

CIA Mired In Incompetence & Sleaze

 

Bush put Hayden in charge of the CIA to try to fix a spy agency that is deeply mired in scandal and incompetence. Its failure to predict, let alone prevent, the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the US, and its role in the fiasco of Saddam Hussein’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction (the quest for which Bush used as his flimsy excuse to invade Iraq  in 2003) are only the latest chapters in a long and sorry history. Believe it or not, Bush also apparently regards the CIA as a hotbed of “liberals” (the worst of all possible things to be in the nightmare world that America has become under Bush), because it has consistently not fallen into (goose)step with Bush and Rumsfeld et al over the Iraq War and the “War On Terror”. As far as Bush is concerned, you are either for him or against him and the CIA is not sufficiently rahrah over the way the American Empire is functioning.

 

Bush thought that he had “fixed” the CIA when he appointed the previous Director, Porter Goss, a former CIA covert agent himself and more latterly a Republican Congressman. But he was a disaster, lasting only 19 months in the job. His desire to clean up the Agency and his obsession with finding “leakers” led to mass resignations or redundancies of many experienced staff. What actually finished him off was a good old fashioned corruption scandal. Kyle Foggo, the third ranked CIA official (Goss had appointed him Executive Director when Goss took over in 2004), resigned in May 2006, amid the unprecedented occurrence of FBI agents executing search warrants on his office at CIA headquarters at Langley, Virginia. Foggo was accused of awarding a contract to an old mate who is a defence contractor. In turn, the latter was put under investigation for allegedly providing a disgraced former Republican Congressman (currently serving eight years in prison for accepting bribes) with prostitutes, limousines and free hotel suites. Goss himself was accused of attending one of the poker games where Foggo and his defence contractor mate did business (Goss denied it). So, Goss got the Presidential boot and none of his staff were sorry to see him go. One former high ranking official was quoted as saying, after Goss’ resignation was announced: ‘There’s more champagne being drunk today than on New Year’s Eve” (Press, 8/5/06; “CIA boss quits over ‘hookergate’”). In yet another NZ parallel, the GCSB’s Tucker was made SIS Director-General to try and fix an agency which, under Richard Woods, has disastrously bungled the case of our only “Islamic terrorist”, namely Ahmed Zaoui.

 

 John Negroponte, Czar Of The Invisible Empire

 

Between his jobs of NSA Director and CIA Director, Hayden was the Deputy Director of National Intelligence. The Director is John Negroponte, whose 2005 appointment as America’s Intelligence “czar”, in charge of 16 separate civilian and military Intelligence agencies, represented the biggest shakeup in US Intelligence since the creation of the CIA and NSA back in the immediate post-World War 2 years. The creation of this new super post represented a demotion for the CIA, whose Director used to be the country’s overall Director of Intelligence and, as such, used to get what Americans call regular “face time” with the President. Not any more – Negroponte is the spyboss who now has Bush’s ear. The CIA is just another spy agency, whose demotion is a direct result of the shock waves created throughout the Invisible Empire of US Intelligence by the September 11 attacks and everything that has flowed from that.

 

John Negroponte is a veteran hitman (quite literally) for the US. He came into the Intelligence job from being US Ambassador to Iraq, where he presided over the biggest US Embassy in the world and was the civilian face of the American war on the Iraqi people, with all its horrors. He gained notoriety in the 1980s when he was Ambassador to Honduras, from where he directed President Ronald Reagan’s proxy war by the contras (expatriate Nicaraguan terrorists) inside neighbouring Nicaragua. Countless human rights violations, including numerous massacres, in both Honduras and Nicaragua can be laid at his feet. Between times he was US Ambassador to postings as diverse as the Philippines and the United Nations. He is a very nasty piece of work. And Michael Hayden is his right hand man. Negroponte was instrumental in getting Porter Goss fired as CIA Director and replaced by Hayden (see Time, 15/5/06; “The Spy Master Cracks The Whip: How John Negroponte won control of the CIA, and what he plans next to consolidate rival agencies and his power”, Michael Duffy).

 

Negroponte presides over a vast Invisible Empire. For half a century the annual Intelligence budget has been a closely guarded secret, with the CIA having won a number of court cases to keep it thus. But, in November 2005, Mary Margaret Graham, Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Collection, casually revealed at a public Intelligence conference that the annual Intelligence budget is $US44 billion. Steven Aftergood, Director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, said: “It is ironic. We sued the CIA four times for this kind of information and lost. You can’t get it through legal channels” (New York Times, 9/11/05, “Official lets slip US spy budget”, Scott Shane).

 

Negroponte and Hayden face a formidable bureaucratic rival in Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. During his term the Pentagon has heavily muscled into the world of Intelligence. Rumsfeld has encouraged the Defense Intelligence Agency to set up its own clandestine teams and act independently of the CIA, whom he regards as too slow. “Many of the secret activities are run by US Special Operations Command in Tampa, Florida, whose 50,000 commandos have the green light to launch missions against terrorists. The command also maintains a clandestine force of several hundred undercover spies, who specialise, for example, in planting electronic sensors or scouting terrorist targets for attack” (Time, 7/2/05; “How Rumsfeld Plans To Shake Up The Spy Game”, Douglas Waller).

 

CIA Now Secret Police Force: Kidnaps, Renditions, Secret Prisons & Torture

 

Conversely, while the military has been doing more spying, the CIA has been transformed by the “War On Terror” prerogatives into a military force in its own right (for example, see the Time cover story, 3/2/03, “The CIA’s Secret Army: “After playing it safe for so long, the CIA is beefing up its own team of combatants and already deploying them in Iraq. Inside the new world of American espionage”, Douglas Waller. This was written, of course, before the US was actually at war with Iraq). And the CIA has morphed from a classic spy agency, which historically tended to contract out its dirty work to Third World allies, to being a full blown secret police. The “War On Terror” has seen the Agency establishing its own network of secret prisons (only publicly acknowledged by Bush in September 2006), openly using torture in them and at Guantanamo Bay (once again, Bush has defended these “harsh interrogation methods”), and kidnapping “terrorists” from foreign countries and flying them to one of its covert torture chambers on clandestine international flights on its own contracted planes. This notorious practice has euphemistically entered the language as “rendition”.

 

And it has led to any number of diplomatic incidents, cockups and the kidnapping, imprisonment and torture of numerous innocent people. To give just one example – in 2005 an Italian court issued arrest warrants for 22 CIA operatives allegedly involved in the kidnapping, several years earlier, of an Egyptian cleric and his “rendition” to Egypt where he was imprisoned and tortured. “Milan prosecutors had no difficulty identifying the officers from cellphone records and a trail of credit card charges left at hotels and restaurants. ‘The spooks aren’t very spooky these days’, says a US counter-terrorism expert” (Time, 19/12/05, “Covering Its Tracks”, Douglas Waller).

 

The “War On Terror” has seen the CIA get caught out in all sorts of dubious practices. Bush’s closest ally in the Islamic world is Pakistani dictator Pervez Musharraf. In 2006, he deeply embarrassed the Bush Administration by publishing his tell all memoir, “In The Line Of Fire”. In it he revealed that the US had threatened to bomb Pakistan “back to the Stone Age” if it didn’t side with the US. And “he says that he was so angered by US attempts to bully Pakistan into supporting the White House that he had his military commanders study ‘war games’ to see if they could take on the American forces should they try to operate inside his borders without permission” (Press, 26/9/06, “Musharraf dishes dirt”, Daniel McGrory). He outed the CIA for having secretly paid Pakistan millions of dollars for handing over 369 alleged al Qaeda figures to the US. Paying such bounties to foreign governments is banned under US law and the Department of Justice said that it knew nothing about it. “The CIA refused to divulge the size of its bounty payments, saying: ‘Our relationships with international leaders are not something we are prepared to talk about’. One senior CIA figure added: ’Nor do we expect these leaders to do so’” (Press, ibid.).These bounty payments have featured in cases where totally innocent people have been sold to the naïve Americans by the likes of corrupt Afghan warlords hankering for some easy money.

 

And The US Is Still Losing The War

 

After all that effort, overt and covert, is the US winning “The War On Terror”? Not according to its own Intelligence structure. In September 2006, an April 06 National Intelligence Estimate written by the National Intelligence Council, created a major domestic and international uproar when it was first leaked and then partially declassified by Bush. The Estimate concluded that the bloodsoaked swamp that Iraq has become, in which the American Goliath is now hopelessly stuck, has become the primary recruitment vehicle for a whole new generation of violent Islamic extremists. “Rather than contributing to eventual victory in the global counter-terrorism struggle, it concludes that the situation in Iraq has worsened the US position…” (Press, 26/9/06, “Iraq war fuels terror”). There is enormous irony in the fact that Bush was adamant that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq was a haven of terrorists (it wasn’t, although it most certainly was a terrorist State towards its own people and some immediate neighbours) and that was used as one of the bullshit justifications (remember the weapons of mass destruction?) to invade and violently remove his regime. By so doing, Bush has ended up creating the very thing that he said he had to go into Iraq to remove – a haven of terrorists (which is the name that all occupiers apply to the locals who ungratefully continue to resist their foreign “liberators”. Funnily enough, Iraqi patriots object to American occupiers just as much as American patriots objected to British occupiers two hundred years ago).

 

If Bush had stuck to “liberating” Afghanistan, from whence Osama bin Laden attacked the US, there is a possibility that the “War On Terror” might have had a better chance of success, and would have retained international support. But the moment he used that as a cockeyed excuse to hare off into invading Iraq, to settle old scores and steal its oil, he lost that international support, and he’s lost the war in Iraq as well. As for “The War On Terror”, that’s not going so well either, and Afghanistan itself is living up to its reputation as a graveyard for foreign invaders. Nice work, George.

-----------------------------

 

previous article

 

 next article

 

contents

 

ABC home