THE SECRET POLICEMAN’S BALL SIS Turns 50, All The Big Brothers Came To The Party

by Murray Horton

Peace Researcher 34 – July 2007

 

2006 marked the 50th anniversary of the woebegotten New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (SIS), which is now headed by Warren Tucker (previously the head of the NZ Government Communications Security Bureau [GCSB), which operates the Waihopai and Tangimoana spybases). For many years now Peace Researcher has regularly detailed the misdoings of the SIS, most recently in PR 33, November 2006, “SIS – New Boss But Same Old Story”, by Murray Horton, which can be read online at http://www.converge.org.nz/abc/pr33-134.html

 

50 is a milestone is anyone’s life (one receding into the past in my case), so the SIS and Government decided to throw a party to mark the occasion. Naturally, it had to be a secret party, held at Government House in Wellington in November 2006 and hosted by the Minister in Charge of the SIS (Helen Clark) and the Governor General, with senior Government officials in attendance. It was only made public after it was over and the special guests had all left. And what special guests they were – star billing went to General Michael Hayden, Director of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Hayden, the former head of the US National Security Agency (NSA, which is the GCSB’s biggest Big Brother and the recipient of Waihopai’s electronic intelligence) flew in his own US Air Force C-17 Globemaster jet, which sat on the tarmac at Wellington Airport for several days before the Dominion Post worked out what was going on. General Hayden met with Ministers and senior officials during his Wellington stay. He has a very controversial recent past as the leading figure in the NSA’s post-9/11 programme of massive domestic spying on Americans (see PR 33, November 2006, “US Spooks Exposed Massively Spying On Their Own People”, by Murray Horton, which can be read online at http://www.converge.org.nz/abc/pr33-135a.html). Other “distinguished” guests included the bosses of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO, domestic spies); Australian Security Intelligence Service (ASIS, international spies); the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS); and Britain’s MI6 and MI5 (international and domestic spies, respectively).

 

What a wonderful bunch of villains, all gathered in little old Wellington to sing “Happy Birthday” to their most junior partner. After the bunfight was over some of the speeches were posted on the SIS Website, including that by the Director, Warren Tucker, who told the partygoers that the SIS is now “fully representative of New Zealand’s modern society” (New Zealand Herald, 19/12/06; “Spies allow a teensy peek into an oh-so-secret affair: SIS reckons it has got the staffing mix right – but life can be tough for families”, Paula Oliver). Paul O’Sullivan, ASIO Director General, spoke of the threat of “home-grown” terrorism (Press, 20/12/06; “Terrorist warning from top Aust spy”, Dan Eaton).

 

This was a celebrity party where the celebrities didn’t want their photos taken, nor do we know what presents they all gave the birthday boy. We can only hope that they all heartily sang the old birthday song: “Why was he born so beautiful, why was he born at all? He’s no bloody good at anything, he’s no bloody good at all”. That sums up the feelings about the SIS by an awful lot of New Zealanders, ABC included.

 

Muslims Are The New Communists

 

Richard Woods was SIS Director from 1999-2006 inclusive (for details, see PR 33, November 2006, “SIS – New Boss But Same Old Story”, by Murray Horton, which can be read online at http://www.converge.org.nz/abc/pr33-134.html). On his last day in office, he told the media that New Zealand has been used as a base by people wanting to learn about or make weapons of mass destruction. Naturally he didn’t provide any evidence to back up this startling claim. Maybe these were the same weapons of mass destruction that proved impossible to find when the US invaded Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. Who knew that they were hiding in NZ all the time?

 

In his final Annual Report (not tabled in Parliament until February 2007, by which time Warren Tucker had been SIS Director for several months) Woods highlighted “the use of the Internet by Islamic extremists poses a real challenge to all Western Intelligence agencies. The Service is no exception” (Press, 22/2/07, “Islamic extremists’ use of Net a threat – SIS”). This was challenged by Green MP Keith Locke who accused Woods of scaremongering to justify the huge leap in the SIS budget from $23.2 million in 2005 to $43.4m in 06. “Mr Woods raises the bogey of Islamic terrorists using the Internet to radicalise people – but there is no indication whether the SIS feels this is an imminent, highly unlikely or merely theoretical threat to New Zealand. Perhaps, as with the Rainbow Warrior terrorist sinking, the SIS expects only to find out afterwards. The SIS Report leaves us none the wiser about whether the SIS is justifying its budget, or merely treading on the toes of the Police force – the agency most engaged with real international criminals” (press release, 22/2/07, “World unsafe: SIS blames foreigners, Islamists”).

 

Woods’ final Report did name some names of this faceless “enemy”. Keith Locke subjected that to critical scrutiny too. “The other specific achievement mentioned in the Report is the expulsion of Rayed Ali, a Yemeni man of ‘security concern’. Oddly, for an agency engaged with the ‘War on Terror’ the SIS just grabbed Rayed Ali and bundled him out of the country, without any serious effort to interrogate him – perhaps because they knew all along he was an innocent party” (ibid).

 

Of course the “Islamic terrorist” who was the prize catch of Woods’ term of office is poor Ahmed Zaoui, the fugitive Algerian MP who is now into his fifth year of being slowly ground through the bureaucratic mill of prison and courts, with no end in sight while he is out on bail but stuck in a legal limbo, subject to restrictions, unable to work or receive any income and separated from his family who are in hiding in South East Asia. PR has reported Zaoui’s case in great detail for years now, most recently in 33, November 2006, “SIS – New Boss But Same Old Story”, by Murray Horton, which can be read online at http://www.converge.org.nz/abc/pr33-134.html). Zaoui is the first person to be the subject of a Security Risk Certificate issued by the SIS. This was set down for an August 2006 review hearing by Paul Neazor, the Inspector-General of Security and Intelligence. However, weeks beforehand, Neazor postponed the hearing indefinitely, saying that he needed more time to prepare. “However, sources close to the case said one of the reasons for the delay was a story in the Press on May 3 (2006) which quoted Zaoui’s lawyers saying they hoped to cross-examine SIS chief, Richard Woods, who has since retired” (Press, 2/1/07, “Zaoui claims unfair treatment”, Dan Eaton). So the SIS was not keen for its boss to be questioned.

 

In June 2007 Neazor announced that the review process would start in July and August, held in private, although it will be dealing with unclassified information only. This first stage involves evidence from Zaoui and witnesses for him, both from NZ and overseas. Zaoui’s special advocates (lawyers given security clearance) have already been to Wellington and inspected the classified information to be used against him, which will be presented at a later stage. This is only part of the unprecedented review process which still has a long, uncharted, way to go.

 

While Zaoui interminably waits for the SIS “oversight” system to resolve his case (and the Government cruelly refuses to allow his family to join him in NZ), he has won a legal battle with the Police. In February 2007 the Police Complaints Authority upheld his complaint against the Police for their actions immediately after he was first arrested, upon arrival at Auckland Airport in December 2002. An undercover cop who spoke only English (which Zaoui then couldn’t speak) was planted on him in custody at the Papakura Police Station and repeatedly asked him bizarre questions such as “Where is Osama bin Laden?”. Zaoui replied, quite correctly, “in Afghanistan” (Sunday Star Times, 18/2/07; “Psst, Mr Zaoui – where’s Osama hiding?”. That was the start of Zaoui’s two years in prison without charge, nearly one year of which was spent in solitary confinement in maximum security). The Zaoui case is a permanent indictment of both Richard Woods and the entire SIS. Coincidentally or not, the 2007 SIS budget has been cut by nearly $9 million to $33.6m. Perhaps there aren’t quite so many Islamic terrorists under the bed as first thought.

 

The Privatisation Of Spying

 

In May 2007 the Sunday Star Times (27/5/07, “’I was paid to betray protesters’. Finding the enemy within”, Nicky Hager and Deidre Mussen) broke the story of how Solid Energy, a State Owned Enterprise (SOE), had employed a firm of private investigators which in turn had recruited  and paid a spy to infiltrate the Save Happy Valley Campaign, which is very successfully stopping Solid Energy from being able to mine coal in an area of the West Coast where there are endangered native snails (it’s a long story and the best way to find out about it is to go to http://www.savehappyvalley.org.nz). The spy’s name is Ryan Paterson-Rouse and, unusually, he fessed up when confronted with irrefutable evidence of his treachery (the private eye company was hoist with its own petard when a computer glitch bounced back all incoming e-mails to their unknowing senders, who thus discovered that their private e-mails were being read and by whom). The article also named an identical spy in Peace Action Wellington, who had started off within the animal rights movement (unlike Ryan, she denies being a spy, despite being confronted with the same evidence. However, she has since vanished, believed to have gone overseas). Ryan’s motivation? The measly $100 a week Solid Energy paid him, which came in handy for a student.

 

Anti-Bases Campaign joined the chorus of groups condemning this corporate spying on behalf of an SOE. Saving Happy Valley is not our issue but this is of more than academic interest to us. Two of our committee members are also involved in the Save Happy Valley Campaign, one a very high profile leading figure (namely Frances Mountier, the spokesperson for the Campaign). As Thompson and Clark, the private eyes, were reading all internal Save Happy Valley Campaign e-mails that means that they were also reading internal ABC e-mails. We demand their assurance that our private correspondence, gathered incidentally to their spying, be deleted immediately and no records kept or passed onto to anyone else.

 

Spies, of the official GCSB and SIS variety, are our bread and butter, of course. We also know a thing or two about spies of the infiltrator variety, having encountered a few of them in the two decades that we’ve been campaigning to close the Waihopai spybase. Having been a political activist for several decades, I’ve encountered these people in a number of groups with which I’ve been involved. On the very first activity of the Campaign Against Foreign Control (CAFCA), namely the 1975 South Island Resistance Ride, an undercover police officer was outed. In CAFCA’s early years we had a committee member who had no “back story” (to use today’s jargon) and who was very interested in looking after our membership records. He duly vanished, only to resurface in another part of the country as a policeman (finishing up as a senior detective). Other people with no back stories have appeared on the scene when major protests have been planned, then just as suddenly disappeared, never to be seen or heard of again. My all time favourite example is the fellow who turned up, a total stranger, at a 1990s’ ABC meeting which was planning a protest at the Waihopai spybase, complete with video camera. When asked to stop filming he protested that he was doing a project to film how people run meetings! Yeah right! That particular cowboy rode off into the sunset too.

 

The Save Happy Valley Campaign spy saga has two different features to the ones I’ve mentioned. In this current case, the spy has confessed, unlike the other infiltrators (we knew what they were, because they fitted the profile to a T). And this is not (directly) official, State, spying but one done by a corporation, on behalf of an SOE (therefore paid by us, the taxpayer, and supposedly accountable to us). This privatisation and contracting out of spying represents a deplorable new trend and one which needs to be stamped out by the Government which is responsible for SOEs. What happened to the self-confessed Christchurch spy? In some other countries, where political movements face a life and death struggle, spies get very short shrift of the terminal variety. But this is good old laid back NZ, so the worst thing that happened to him was that he had to front up to an emotional meeting of the Save Happy Valley Campaign (people whom he publicly called his friends) and apologise. It would make a great movie, I’ve already got the title: “Saving Private Eye Ryan”.

 

previous article

 

next article

 

contents

 

ABC home