OKINAWA AND GUAM - US Military Pawns Since WWII by Bob Leonard

Peace Researcher 34 – July 2007

 

The small Pacific islands of Okinawa and Guam are separated by about 2000 km. But they are inextricably linked by being pawns in the staging of US military forces since World War II. Okinawa is the southern-most island of Japan having been forcibly taken over back in 1879.  Guam, an island of the Marianas to the southeast of Okinawa, has been US territory since the big war. Both islands were scenes of some of the bloodiest fighting in the Pacific. And both islands have indigenous peoples who have been the innocent victims of war and occupation for decades.  Their suffering continues under constant military oppression by US naval, air force and marine personnel and their families, and political oppression from both US and Japanese governments and their minions. The following items, taken primarily from information provided by the international No US Bases network, illustrate the current state of some critical affairs in Guam and Okinawa. This article continues Peace Researcher’s coverage of the saga of Okinawa, and now Guam, in several recent issues (e.g. see PR 33, November 2006, “North Korea Compounds Okinawa’s Problems Of US Military Occupation”, by Bob Leonard, which can be read online at http://www.converge.org.nz/abc/pr33-140.html ).

 

Ripping Off The Japanese People For US$6 Billion

 

The dominant issue uniting the peoples of Okinawa and Guam is the planned relocation of thousands of US military personnel from US bases in Okinawa to bases in Guam. The US government is trying to force the Japanese government (read Japanese taxpayers) to pay for a majority of the relocation costs, some US$6 billion. To its credit the Japanese government has been reluctant to agree to this unprecedented rip-off. It would be the first time ever that a foreign nation has had to pay such costs, and apparently with no legal basis. Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Aso “…said that neither the Japan-US Security Treaty nor the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) applies to this case…” (Okinawa-Guam Information Service on the US Marines Relocations [OGIS], Issue No 2, 30/4/07).

 

As of the time of writing the deal was not yet final and it could actually take up to three years before the Japanese Diet (Parliament) even begins to discuss the matter. Apparently the process depends on completion of an Environmental Impact Statement by the US Navy. A major element of the Statement will be the impacts of shifting thousands of personnel to Guam. Another major issue is who will benefit from the massive construction of housing and related infrastructure that will be needed on Guam to accommodate the population influx. US contractors are of course drooling over the prospects but fear “the bulk of the contracting work may still end up with Japanese companies” (Variety News Staff, 29/5/07, GR Partido).This will sound familiar to readers who know of the billions of dollars pocketed by US companies engaged in the “rebuilding of Iraq” (in this case a massive rip-off of the American taxpayers). Militarism and war are hugely profitable for private corporations, and when the US is involved, those corporations are almost always US-owned and intimately linked to the political machinations behind the military.

 

If the Japanese do accept the costs of the relocation to Guam, just over half the US$6 billion will be in the form of loans to the US. But will the US repay the debt? There is considerable doubt since the Japanese government has no concrete measures in mind to assure repayment. It will simply “do its best to collect the debt”. The magnitude of the debt would be peanuts on the grand scale of US military spending but it’s fascinating that Japan could even contemplate saddling its people with a potentially “bad debt” to fund a scheme with no clear benefits to Japan.

 

What Would It Buy For Japan?

 

There may well be benefits to the people of Okinawa of getting rid of a few thousand US military folk. But given Japan’s appalling lack of concern for the well-being of colonial Okinawa it is extremely doubtful that spending all that relocation money is seriously intended to address decades of abuse of Okinawans. Here is what the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Installations and Environment, BJ Penn, had to say recently about US motivation for the move:  US national interests and treaty commitments require strengthening of US military capabilities in the Western Pacific…. The relocation of III Marine Expeditionary Force personnel from Okinawa to Guam under US-Japan Alliance Transformation and Realignment is part of a broader realignment … essential for the defence of Japan and for peace and security in the region”  (Pacific Daily News, 29 May 2007, DV Crisostomo).

 

Japan recently bought into this realignment by passing a bill in its Lower House “allowing” Japan to pay the US$6 billion and undertake various other measures, including “forcing the local governments to cooperate with the central government in implementing the realignment plan”  (OGIS loc. cit.) It’s all rather mysterious just how Japan stands to benefit from all this. A cynical view would be that is motivated by Prime Minister Abe’s desire for a major shift in defence policy which would allow Japan to participate in collective defence under the UN Charter. That right cannot now be exercised without “breaking the Constitution” (OGIS ibid.). Breaking the Constitution would have serious implications including the potential for Japan to acquire nuclear weapons.

 

What Would It Buy For Guam?

 

The short answer is nothing. A longer answer would include increased social disruption, crime and environmental degradation beyond what Guam has already been suffering for many years.  No one should be fooled into thinking a process of preparing an Environmental Impact Assessment carried out by the US Navy or any other military body is anything other than a diversionary tactic and a sham. Military bases within the US itself routinely ignore environmental controls on emissions and dumping or ask the Environmental Protection Agency (itself a bit of a joke under the thumb of the Bush cabal) to exempt them from environmental performance standards.

 

Guam is an unincorporated US territory. Its people are US citizens who have no vote and its congressional representative has no vote in the US Congress. In other words, Guam is a colony powerless to control its own destiny. The people of Guam, including its indigenous people, the Chamorros (37% of Guam’s estimated total population of about 155,000), strongly oppose the relocation of more US military personnel to their island from Okinawa. The Chamorro people feel their race, identity and culture are under threat of destruction as their homeland becomes even more intensely militarised. The American government has ignored their pleas to deal with environmental contamination of their land and harbours with highly toxic substances including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and Agents Orange and Purple (pesticides). Disease rates among Guam’s people are very high and include a variety of cancers, some of which are almost certainly due to radiation exposure from US nuclear weapons testing in Micronesia in the 1950s.

 

Economic dependency and instability, rather than the boon promised by local politicians, are the inevitable consequences of occupation by a foreign military. The experience on Okinawa has been the same as on Guam.  In fact every small developing nation that has been subjected to the forced establishment of foreign military bases has suffered the same fate as Guam and Okinawa.  The Philippines is another prime example of the horrific impact of US colonisation that continues to this day with rampant political corruption and brutal suppression of resistance movements (see the article elsewhere in this issue about the ongoing US military presence in the Philippines, a decade and a half after the huge US bases there were evicted as a result of decades of a massive anti-bases campaign. Ed.).

 

Okinawan activists have neatly summed up the “logic” of the relocation process: “Most importantly, we are challenging people to ponder the critical question: ‘If the presence of the Marines is such a good thing for Guam, then why is Japan willing to pay US$6 billion to get them out [of Okinawa]?’” (Islands Business News, 1/5/07, Elenoa Baselala).

 

And What About The Dugongs Of Henoko?

 

We don’t need to repeat the problems visited upon the people of Okinawa by US bases (see recent issues of Peace Researcher which can be read online at http://www.converge.org.nz/abc/prfront.html ). Resistance by the local people to the relocation of a US helicopter base at Futenma continues unabated on a daily basis. The new location would be further to the north in Okinawa at Henoko Bay and would involve irreversible damage to a marine ecosystem that is home to an endangered local dugong* species. The people of Ginowan City, within which the Futenma base presents a great physical danger, would surely benefit from the closure of that base. But the problems would simply be shifted to people living near Henoko Bay with zero net gain for Okinawans. * Dugongs, or sea cows, are large marine mammals. Ed.

 

Preparations for the construction of an airstrip located partially in Henoko Bay are currently entailing a bizarre environmental “pre-survey” which will then lead to an Environmental Impact Assessment. The EIA has been labelled a façade that “will not be a precise or open environmental assessment, since the appropriate law-abiding procedures will not be/have not been conducted”.

 

“According to news reports, the Japanese Government has dispatched the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force ship ‘Bungo’ to Henoko, Okinawa. ‘Bungo’ is gun boat and minesweeper equipped with divers. It is reported the members of Maritime Self Defense Force will assist private contractors in the environmental ‘pre-survey’ for the military off-shore base at Henoko”.

 

The above quote is from an “Urgent Call for Henoko” circulated by Filipino anti-bases activist Cora Fabros on the No US Bases e-list (16/5/07) with the inspired headline: “Japanese Government points gun at Okinawans for the first time since World War II”. Cora Fabros was a member of the international anti-bases community who joined about 300 local people at Henoko Beach on May 14 to protest the US presence and the looming destruction of the Bay ecosystems in the name of defence (Cora was also a member of an international delegation in New Zealand back in 1990. She participated in ABC’s Touching the Bases Tour [Tangimoana, Waihopai, Black Birch(now closed) and Harewood], which you can read about in PR 28 [First Series],  February 1991, “Linking, Learning And Levitation: A Report On The Anti-Bases Campaign Touching The Bases Tour”, by “a witness”).

 

The courage and persistence of the people of Okinawa and Guam in their struggles against US bases should be an inspiration to us all. 

 

previous article

 

next article

 

contents

 

ABC home