Help PMA grow | Petition forms | Site map | PMA main page
Homes not Bombs
TEXT OF FLYER 'HOMES NOT BOMBS'
Because Canada should build homes, not blow them up.
Convert the War Department to the Housing Department
Homelessness in Canada has been declared a national disaster by city councils, big-city mayors, and thousands of individuals and organizations.
Canada is the only Western nation without a national housing policy. If Canada spent in one year on affordable housing and related support programs what it spends each year on war, homelessness could be virtually eliminated.
Instead of funding child care, adequate levels of income support, affordable housing, women's programs, education and health care, Ottawa consistently spends its largest block of "discretionary" funding on the War Department (about $10 billion annually, over a quarter of a trillion dollars since 1980).
Ottawa is actively seeking a role in the revived U.S.-led Star Wars Nuclear War Fighting Program, and is considering a $635 million commitment to the project. The Chretien government has rejected a debate about the issue, "saying they will publicly deal with the missile issue when the system is ready to be deployed." - Ottawa Citizen
Canada continues to support an arms industry which annually exports hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of weapons to human rights violators around the world.
Funding the bombing of Yugoslavia by Canadian fighter jets took precedence over new funding for housing. People are made homeless in Canada because money which could have been spent on affordable housing at home is used to drop bombs on civilians abroad, making them homeless too. Canada opens the purse strings for the dropping of 500-pound bombs, but where were those funds when the democratic opposition of the Balkans needed it most?
Canada's ongoing commitment to war training also destroys cultures here, as the Innu people of Nitassinan continue to struggle against NATO war testing over their homeland.
Imagine a Canada that, for one year, spends not a dime on war, and uses that money for desperately needed social programs for the homeless, the underhoused, battered women, the environment, the unemployed. Imagine the possibilities, then join us in Ottawa November 12 to make it happen.
To Build Homes...
...or to Blow Them Up
PAGE 2 OF THE FLYER
CANADA'S WAR AGAINST THE POOR: AT HOME AND ABROAD
In 1996, Statistics Canada estimated it would take only $18.6 billion to bring every Canadian out of poverty, less than what the War Department spends in a two-year period. Yet given the choice of where to spend, Ottawa has made its priorities clear:
When War Minister Art Eggleton first discussed the cost of bombing Yugoslavia, he declared, "It's obviously something that the government of Canada will cover."
A week later, the Toronto Star reported "(Federal minister responsible for homelessness) Bradshaw's spokesperson said yesterday there are no plans to put more money into affordable housing."
And so it has been for the past 20 years. While Ottawa has eliminated funding for new affordable housing, it has spent, since 1980, over a quarter of a trillion dollars on war. We may have killer CF-18s which can drop "smart" bombs with the best of them, but Canada remains the only Western nation without a national housing policy.
"With major procurement programs emphasizing equipment of high intensity combat, Canada's [military] establishment remains bound to Cold War categories...the [War] Department continues to prepare first and foremost for war," concludes a 1998 Project Ploughshares report.
As hundreds of homeless people die on the streets of Canada each year, Ottawa continues to spend upwards of 500% more on its military than it does on housing. As with the U.S., Canada's percentage of monies spent on social housing is dangerously low. Only 5.5% of Canada's housing is non-market social housing (compared with 15% in France and Germany, 22% in the U.K. and 40% in the Netherlands.)
Yet monies never seem to be scarce when it comes to bombing other countries or enforcing punitive sanctions that have killed over 1 million Iraqis. By depriving the poor of Canada of the income supports necessary to have adequate food, clothing and shelter, Ottawa is in effect enforcing economic sanctions against them too.
While over 5 million Canadians struggle to survive below the poverty line, millions line up at food banks, Canadian children by the hundreds of thousands wait in vain for affordable child care spaces, and unemployment recipients face even tighter restrictions, Ottawa forges ahead, spending billions on Leopard CI battle tanks, upgrades of CF-18s (to use Advanced Air-to-Air Weapons, air-to-surface "smart bombs" and missiles), the Armoured Combat Vehicle Project, and much more.
Our membership in NATO requires that we bomb other countries, yet our membership in the UN, which requires us to house, clothe and feed everyone adequately, is an obligation ignored. Perhaps if we spent billions on learning peace, and not on training for war, our "contribution" to Yugoslvia would not have been so bloody.
It is everyone's human right to have access to decent food, shelter, and employment, but these rights have fallen under the weight of "fiscal responsibility." Failure to implement programs which ensure these basic rights is a moral and, according to the United Nations, a legal failure. This injustice is further entrenched when monies for such programs are available, but are spent instead on war.
Homes Not Bombs is a nonviolent campaign which seeks to end this injustice.